<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EVE Online: Dominion - Titan Nerf and Facebook Fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/</link>
	<description>A blog about MMORPGs like World of Warcraft (WoW) and Everquest 2 (EQ2)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-12658</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-12658</guid>
		<description>Why did they rename the Mother Ships to Super-Carriers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did they rename the Mother Ships to Super-Carriers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BinkSayres</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-12657</link>
		<dc:creator>BinkSayres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-12657</guid>
		<description>Saddly, the Fighter-Bombers can only be fielded by the Mother Ships...now renamed "Super-Carriers".  I understand their reasoning, and it's a very small gripe...but a Nyx Super-Carrier just doesn't have the same ring as a Nyx MotherShip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saddly, the Fighter-Bombers can only be fielded by the Mother Ships&#8230;now renamed &#8220;Super-Carriers&#8221;.  I understand their reasoning, and it&#8217;s a very small gripe&#8230;but a Nyx Super-Carrier just doesn&#8217;t have the same ring as a Nyx MotherShip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom hanks</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9794</link>
		<dc:creator>tom hanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-9794</guid>
		<description>There is a bomber, its called a stealth bomber and you can fly those already.

The new fighter bombers will be drones controlled by a carrier pilot.  Should be fun.  I am tired of carriers have pathetic weaponry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a bomber, its called a stealth bomber and you can fly those already.</p>
<p>The new fighter bombers will be drones controlled by a carrier pilot.  Should be fun.  I am tired of carriers have pathetic weaponry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9615</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-9615</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I also quite like the idea of piloting a bomber fighter :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I also quite like the idea of piloting a bomber fighter <img src='http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/wp-content/plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' width='16' height='16' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9614</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-9614</guid>
		<description>They've said it's still in the pipelines but yeah, that was my thought too. Maybe they're going to use the same engine or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve said it&#8217;s still in the pipelines but yeah, that was my thought too. Maybe they&#8217;re going to use the same engine or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9613</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-9613</guid>
		<description>Thing is (I don't know much about it all so this is just a guess) that Titans may end up being kinda pointless if all they can do is take out another large ship. I'm guessing they cost so much and take so long to make that it may not be worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing is (I don&#8217;t know much about it all so this is just a guess) that Titans may end up being kinda pointless if all they can do is take out another large ship. I&#8217;m guessing they cost so much and take so long to make that it may not be worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9612</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-9612</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I guess CCP have good motivations for doing it all. Not much fun if no one comes out to play! I'd love to see a Titan in action one day :) Bet it's an awesome site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I guess CCP have good motivations for doing it all. Not much fun if no one comes out to play! I&#8217;d love to see a Titan in action one day <img src='http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/wp-content/plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' width='16' height='16' /> Bet it&#8217;s an awesome site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbp</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9604</link>
		<dc:creator>mbp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-9604</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of the bomber but I hope it is a frigate class ship piloted by human and not a carrier drone. I could see that going a long way to discourage "biggest ship wins" and put the emphasis on combined arms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of the bomber but I hope it is a frigate class ship piloted by human and not a carrier drone. I could see that going a long way to discourage &#8220;biggest ship wins&#8221; and put the emphasis on combined arms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: West Karana » Daily Blogroll 9/9/09 &#8211; Galaxy Express edition</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9602</link>
		<dc:creator>West Karana » Daily Blogroll 9/9/09 &#8211; Galaxy Express edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-9602</guid>
		<description>[...] a lot of starship-sized paths to the power core. Gordon of We Fly Spitfires says the Titan-only 10k radius sphere of destruction is being made&#8230; single target. Now, I&#8217;m still an EVE noob, but even I can see why that is a Bad Idea. AE spheres of doom [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a lot of starship-sized paths to the power core. Gordon of We Fly Spitfires says the Titan-only 10k radius sphere of destruction is being made&#8230; single target. Now, I&#8217;m still an EVE noob, but even I can see why that is a Bad Idea. AE spheres of doom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vagueness</title>
		<link>http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/2009/09/08/eve-online-dominion-titan-nerf-and-facebook-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-9599</link>
		<dc:creator>vagueness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.weflyspitfires.com/?p=1653#comment-9599</guid>
		<description>I'm guessing we won't see space station based walkabouts in EVE at all now they've announced Dust 514.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing we won&#8217;t see space station based walkabouts in EVE at all now they&#8217;ve announced Dust 514.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
